OM-Montpellier: all the probable line-ups – Season

3
OM-Montpellier: all the probable line-ups – Season

This Sunday, OM finally receives Montpellier without Arkadiusz Milik. Here are the probable eleven that could line up Jorge Sampaoli. In video, the pre-match part of the last talk show. You can also vote for your composition by choosing the eleven holders in the poll below.

Returns of Luan Peres and Harit

As indicated in the section “the Coach is us”, Sampaoli should once again trust Luan Peres and Amine Harit. The first was suspended for the last two games, the second remained on the bench against PAOK. In view of the glitches affecting Milik and Bakambu, it is Payet who would be “false nine”, at the expense of a Bamba Dieng who would take Harit out of the eleven.

P.Lopez – Rongier, Saliba, Caleta-Car, L.Peres – B.Kamara – Under, Guendouzi, Harit, Gerson – Payet

Rather Kolasinac and Bamba Dieng

Here, same diagram, same idea of ​​Payet “false nine”. But two changes. First of all Kolasinac again aligned at the left side position at the expense of Luan Peres as well as Bamba Dieng still in the starting team. But as we have already seen, rather at the start on the left wing. With a refocused Gerson, Harit on the right side and therefore Cengiz Under who pays the price.

P. Lopez – Rongier, Saliba, Caleta-Car, Kolasinac – B. Kamara – Harit, Guendouzi, Gerson, Bamba Dieng – Payet

Return of 3-2-4-1

Quite plausible idea, once again, the 3-2-4-1 with Kamara in libero and the Rongier pair, P.Gueye recovering, as against Nice. What not to align a left side in the eleven, leaving Gerson to manage the entire corridor.

P.Lopez – Saliba, B.Kamara, Caleta-Car – Rongier, P.Gueye – Under, Guendouzi, Harit, Gerson – Payet

The same as on the Talk Show except for one detail

Same composition here as the first proposed except for one detail, an uncertainty in the left-back position.

P.Lopez – Rongier, Saliba, Caleta-Car, L.Peres (or Caleta-Car) – B.Kamara – Under, Guendouzi, Harit, Gerson – Payet

similar posts

Leave a Reply